Obstructed Hemi-Vagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis Syndrome in Adulthood: A Diagnostic Challenge.

A patient in her early 20s presented with constant and progressive lower abdominal and back pain, mainly on the right side of the abdomen, purulent vaginal discharge and pyrexia. A radiological assessment revealed a possible tubo-ovarian abscess and the incidental diagnosis of ipsilateral renal agenesis. The patient was treated for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID); however, after antibiotic administration and since the symptoms did not resolve, an abdominal MRI was requested, which revealed uterus didelphys with two cervices, an obstructed haemivagina and evidence of haematocolpos. The diagnosis of Obstructed Hemi-Vagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis (OHVIRA) syndrome was confirmed, and the patient underwent the excision of the vaginal septum, the drainage of the haematopyocolpos and the laparoscopic drainage of the tubo-ovarian abscess. She achieved a good recovery.

The impact of semen parameters on ICSI and pregnancy outcomes in egg recipient cycles with PGT-A.

BACKGROUND: The egg donation model offers an opportunity to isolate the male factor and evaluate its impact on IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of non-obstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes compared with severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia in egg recipient cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, including 1594 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection in egg recipient cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The cohort was divided into three groups: couples with non-obstructive azoospermia accounting for 479 patients (30%); couples with severe oligozoospermia (sperm number <5 × 106 /mL), accounting for 442 patients (27.8%); couples with mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia, with sperm number >5 × 106 and <15 × 106 /mL, accounting for 673 patients (42.2%). RESULTS: The fertilisation rate was significantly reduced in the non-obstructive azoospermia group as compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group: 30.3% versus 63% and 77.3% (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders highlighted non-obstructive azoospermia as a negative predictor of obtaining a euploid blastocyst both per injected oocyte and per obtained blastocyst. The miscarriage rate in the non-obstructive azoospermia group was 11.8%; higher than the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia groups (7% and 2.7%) (p < 0.05). The live birth rate per embryo transfer (ET) was significantly lower in the non-obstructive azoospermia group compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (20.4% vs. 30.3% and 35.4%, p < 0.05). The risk of preterm labour was significantly higher in the non-obstructive azoospermia group, compared with the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (55.1% vs. 46.8% and 16.1%, p < 0.001), and this difference was observed in both singleton and twin pregnancies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our retrospective comparative study, non-obstructive azoospermia significantly affects early embryonic potential and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer. It is also associated with higher risk of preterm birth. Future prospective multi-centre studies are needed to highlight the effect of sperm quality on ART and pregnancy outcomes.

The treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent evidence around the treatment of infertility in patients with endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The management of endometriosis associated infertility remains challenging. There have been an increasing number of prospective observational studies highlighting the role of surgery to enhance assisted conception amongst those with deep rectovaginal endometriosis. Further validation studies confirm the role of the endometriosis fertility index in prediction of reproductive outcomes after surgery, and confirm that it can be employed in counselling patients prior to surgery on their likelihood of spontaneous conception. Further randomized trials are required to establish the role of surgically treating superficial and deep endometriosis and both spontaneous and assisted conception outcomes. SUMMARY: Endometriosis continues to present challenges in counselling patients with regards to their fertility prospects. This article reviews the recent research findings that may assist in the management of patients with endometriosis associated infertility.

Nonsurgical management of adenomyosis: an overview of current evidence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adenomyosis is a condition where endometrium-like tissue spreads within the myometrium. Although its prevalence in the general population is not exactly known, its clinical manifestations are well established and include pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea (painful periods), heavy menstrual bleeding and subfertility [1] . Adenomyosis often coexists with other gynaecological conditions, such as endometriosis or fibroids, and may cloud the clinical presentation [2] . The aim of this article is to review current noninterventional, nonsurgical management modalities and wherever possible offer information that allows women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies support that medical strategies, including the Mirena coil, Dienogest and GnRH antagonists, are efficient in improving adenomyosis-associated symptoms. High-quality evidence is scarce and is needed to properly counsel women with this condition. Future research should prioritize overall pain, menstrual bleeding, quality of life and live birth as primary outcomes and assess women with different grades of adenomyosis. SUMMARY: This review provides the most current evidence with regards to the nonsurgical management of adenomyosis. In light of the paucity and low quality of existing data, high-quality trials are needed to definitely determine the impact of conservative and medical treatment on the clinical management of adenomyosis.

Pentoxifylline for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain and infertility.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that occurs during the reproductive years. It is characterised by endometrium-like tissue developing outside the uterine cavity. This endometriotic tissue development is dependent on oestrogen produced primarily by the ovaries and partially by the endometriotic tissue itself, therefore traditional management has focused on ovarian suppression. In this review we considered the role of modulation of the immune system as an alternative approach. This is an update of a Cochrane Review previously published in 2012. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of pentoxifylline in the management of endometriosis.  SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and AMED on 16 December 2020, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pentoxifylline with placebo or no treatment, other medical treatment, or surgery in women with endometriosis. The primary outcomes were live birth rate and overall pain (as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, other validated scales, or dichotomous outcomes) per woman randomised. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, rate of recurrence, and adverse events resulting from the pentoxifylline intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies against the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, consulting a third review author where required. We contacted study authors as needed. We analysed dichotomous outcomes using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a fixed-effect model. For small numbers of events, we used a Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI instead. We analysed continuous outcomes using the mean difference (MD) between groups presented with 95% CIs. We used the I2 statistic to evaluate heterogeneity amongst studies. We employed the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included five parallel-design RCTs involving a total of 415 women. We included one additional RCT in this update. Three studies did not specify details relating to allocation concealment, and two studies were not blinded. There were also considerable loss to follow-up, with four studies not conducting intention-to-treat analysis. We judged the quality of the evidence as very low. Pentoxifylline versus placebo No trials reported on our primary outcomes of live birth rate and overall pain. We are uncertain as to whether pentoxifylline treatment affects clinical pregnancy rate when compared to placebo (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.10; 3 RCTs, n = 285; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the clinical pregnancy rate with placebo is estimated to be 20%, then the rate with pentoxifylline is estimated as between 18% and 43%. We are also uncertain as to whether pentoxifylline affects the recurrence rate of endometriosis (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.36; 1 RCT, n = 121; very low-quality evidence) or miscarriage rate (Peto OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.20 to 19.37; 2 RCTs, n = 164; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). No trials reported on the effect of pentoxifylline on improvement of endometriosis-related symptoms other than pain or adverse events. Pentoxifylline versus no treatment No trials reported on live birth rate. We are uncertain as to whether pentoxifylline treatment affects overall pain when compared to no treatment at one month (MD -0.36, 95% CI -2.12 to 1.40; 1 RCT, n = 34; very low-quality evidence), two months (MD -1.25, 95% CI  -2.67 to 0.17; 1 RCT, n = 34; very low-quality evidence), or three months (MD -1.60, 95% CI -3.32 to 0.12; 1 RCT, n = 34; very low-quality evidence). No trials reported on adverse events caused by pentoxifylline or any of our other secondary outcomes. Pentoxifylline versus other medical therapies One study (n = 83) compared pentoxifylline to the combined oral contraceptive pill after laparoscopic surgery to treat endometriosis, but could not be included in the meta-analysis as it was unclear if the data were presented as +/- standard deviation and what the duration of treatment was. No trials reported on adverse events caused by pentoxifylline or any of our other secondary outcomes. Pentoxifylline versus conservative surgical treatment  No study reported on this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No studies reported on our primary outcome of live birth rate. Due to the very limited evidence, we are uncertain of the effects of pentoxifylline on clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or overall pain. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of pentoxifylline in the management of women with endometriosis with respect to subfertility and pain relief outcomes.

Early Onset Preeclampsia Diagnosis Prior to the 20th Week of Gestation in a Twin Pregnancy Managed via Selective Reduction of an Intrauterine Growth Restriction Fetus: A Case Report and Literature Review.

A single, healthy, 44-year-old perimenopausal woman pursuing a pregnancy, employed donor embryos, resulting to a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. In the 18th week of gestation severe symptoms indicated early onset preeclampsia reporting severe hypertension (BP 180/90 mmHg), intense headaches and nausea as well as elevated 24-h urine protein levels (1.5 g/day). Concurrently diagnosis of an IUGR fetus was concluded. Standard pharmaceutical administration for treating preeclampsia was ordered. Persistence of symptoms indicated recommendation for pregnancy termination, however the patient opted against this. Selective embryo reduction was performed as the last resort prior to pregnancy termination. Following selective reduction the headaches and nausea were successfully subdued and the patient's blood pressure was adjusted (mean BP 130/80 mmHg). This enabled further progression of pregnancy for an impressive 11 week-period, and a live birth on the 30th week. To conclude, only a few rare cases have been reported with diagnosis of early onset preeclampsia prior to the 20th week mark and none report live births. Albeit termination of pregnancy was recommended, the management of selective reduction of the IUGR fetus enabled successful treatment of preeclampsia coupled by a live birth of a healthy infant without any perinatal or postnatal complications reported.

Ischaemic stroke and pre-eclampsia in the third trimester of pregnancy: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

A 23-year-old low-risk primiparous patient, who was 35 weeks pregnant, presented in the emergency department after collapsing at home. Her observations showed severe hypertension with proteinuria. On examination, she had left hemiparesis and was aphasic. Fetal monitoring was reassuring. Initial CT did not reveal any evidence of intracranial pathology. She was stabilised and delivered via emergency caesarean section. Subsequent MRI and CT showed an acute right-sided infarct involving the right middle cerebral artery territory, frontal and parietal regions, and increased mass effect. She was transferred to the nearest neurosurgical centre where she was conservatively managed and discharged home 3 weeks later for continuing rehabilitation. She achieved a good recovery.